Fighting Cancer — Having a Gentle Feeling of Cancer? I can assist you if you want to control your life. I can show you options that work to gently and effectively manage your cancer. Are you feeling overwhelmed by the challenge of cancer? Do you want to control your treatment and life? I can assist you. I can demonstrate options that are gentle and non-toxic and work permanently to control your cancer. You can learn how to find a doctor who is sympathetic to these treatments and will oversee your care.
The “big three” of conventional cancer treatment—surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation—are no longer necessary. There are only three causes of death for cancer patients today: 1) A lack of knowledge; 2) Discipline deficiency; and 3) unwavering faith in their cancer specialists. Children with Cancer
My story begins on November 1, 1994, when Marjorie, my former wife, passed away. She had led a truly exceptional and fruitful life. She was a dear to me.
Memories of watching her treated by the conventional cancer “system” will never fade. The barbaric nature of her treatments and the extreme pain she endured for four years left me baffled and frustrated. I observed dozens of other cancer patients receiving what appeared to be toxic and ineffective “treatment” via IV.
My wife's vitality and life force were slowly being destroyed by this baffling intruder for no apparent reason. Is there anything better?” I had doubts.
I became aware of the tsunami of information about cancer (and everything else!) that was building up on the Internet in 1998. I promised to “turn lemons into lemonade” and follow Marjorie's advice. In November 2000, I began researching the book that became an e-book. Since then, I have continuously updated and revised it three times. It is still available as a “real” book today. “Cancer-Free,” the most recent edition, is the result of four years of feedback from cancer survivors, researchers, doctors, and “crusaders” like me around the world.
Why you need to become more knowledgeable about cancer When you first enter the oncologist's office after receiving a cancer diagnosis, you need to be more knowledgeable about the disease than they are. What? Are you smarter than the cancer doctor? Yes. Exactly. You need to be smarter than your oncologist if you want to beat cancer and get it under control.
Why?
THE “SYSTEM” FOR CANCER All current conventional cancer treatments are funded by pharmaceutical companies. With the assistance of our federal and state governments, any competition is brutally suppressed. On this topic, numerous books have been written, some of which are superior to others. “Politics in Healing,” by Daniel Haley, is one of the best. The corruption is a very real thing. Don't let it get to you.
A FEW FACTS * Over 150 gentle and non-toxic cancer treatments have successfully treated patients in the United States alone since the 1930s. Hundreds have been cured by some treatments. Numerous have cured thousands. Many of these people are familiar to me. Why won't your cancer doctor tell you about these? because each of them comes from nature. As a result, pharmaceutical companies cannot profit from them and they cannot be patented. All conventional cancer treatments are based on this straightforward fact.
The rate of cancer deaths per 100,000 people has steadily increased since President Nixon declared a “War on Cancer” in 1971. If you were the general in charge of this “war,” you would almost certainly have substituted a different strategy by now. Instead, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) continues to receive funding from taxpayers. Your tax money is requested for $6.2 billion (with a “b”) this year in their budget request. In 1937, this organization was established. They haven't tested even one of the 150 “alternative” substances mentioned above in their 67-year history.
When they leave the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 55% of executives work for a pharmaceutical company. The 600 full-time lobbyists for “Big Pharma” in Washington include a number of former Congressmen. The pharmaceutical industry contributes the most to political campaigns.
Prior to passing away, the typical cancer patient contributes $500,000 to the “system” of cancer treatment. Because it is covered by private insurance or Medicare/Medicaid, the majority of cancer patients are unaware of this. Cancer affects over 1.2 million Americans annually. Every year, 1,500 Americans die from cancer, which causes over 570,000 deaths. The treatment of cancer is a very big business.
One breast cancer drug made AstraZeneca $630 million in 2001, according to Forbes magazine. They refer to it as Nolvadex, also known as Tamoxifen. What prompted the change in the name? because this drug received its first patent in 1972. AstraZeneca has manipulated the filler, packaging, and other minor changes to extend the patent's lifespan and steer clear of cheaper generic versions, as is typical for expensive prescription drugs.
Have you ever wondered why a pharmaceutical company would spend $200-500 million testing a new drug? In the past 32 years, AstraZeneca and its predecessors have made more than $18 billion from Tamoxifen, also known as Nolvadex. In 2002, AstraZeneca was expected to make $2.6 billion from cancer drugs alone, according to Forbes.
The politics of our government encourage oncologist fraud and abuse through its Medicare program. For instance, oncologists buy the chemotherapy drug Etoposide in bulk so that they can give it to cancer patients in their offices. The expense for the oncologist is $7.50 for a 100mg portion. However, that same 100mg dose only qualifies for $129.24 in Medicare reimbursement. For this dose, you and I, the consumer, pay a co-payment of $25.87, which is nearly three and a half times the cost of the doctor! We pay the remainder through Medicare.
As indicated by the Diary of the American Clinical Affiliation (JAMA), the typical oncologist makes $253,000 per year. Seventy-five percent of this is profit from chemotherapy drugs administered in their office. Tamoxifen and Etoposide, among others, treat cancer's symptoms rather than its causes.
A new overview of the 64 oncologists on the staff at McGill Disease Treatment Center in Montreal viewed that as 58 of them (91%) said they wouldn't take chemotherapy or permit their relatives to take it for malignant growth treatment. Why not? Ineffective and too toxic. Chemotherapy is currently administered to 75% of cancer patients. How bizarre!
Very few oncologists tell their patients that there are dozens of inexpensive medications that can effectively mitigate the side effects of radiation and chemotherapy. Why? They simply are unaware of them. They are either too narrow-minded or too busy to study what my readers and I study.
Chemotherapy-treated patients with metastasized cancer have a 3% long-term survival rate. When used alone, the majority of the “alternative” substances I discuss have long-term survival rates ranging from 50 to 70 percent (though only a few of them are). Survival rates are increased to 90% or higher when diverse and compatible “alternative” substances are combined.
According to a recent Life Extension Foundation survey, 80% of cancer patients use “alternative” medications. They don't tell their cancer doctor about half of their medications. This clearly demonstrates the “ignorance and arrogance” of the “system” for treating cancer.
Enough? Before you “submit” to treatment, do you understand why you need to be aware of the environment? Drug company money has completely corrupted our medical system. This cannot be changed in our lifetimes by either of us. By being aware of this and taking control of your own health care, we can survive chronic, degenerative diseases like cancer, and I am committed to assisting you in doing so.
Power is knowledge. Soon, I'll explain how to do this. Keep watching. Moreover, I am only a “reporter” and not a physician. Only my books, which you can find on my website, are for sale.