the ichorian sequence?
a rough life area in a rough town within a war torn country in a volatile region.
a supermarket queue in a rough life area.
both cashier and customer looking through a black plastic bin full of receipts.
some people in the queue get a little agitated and protest. stuff tells them the only solution is to move, to a back of an already long queue at the adjacent till.
is this situation surreal? my mind has its own event.
i was wondering how come many people in these rough places, find it slightly on the hard side to consider art works as being other than visually pleasing representations.
representation, as a claim that one set is sufficiently approximating another is a corruption of the very claim to be representational.
{ say we claim that this X is represented by this X. as you can see the 2 Xs, while looking very similar, the same font, same software, same machinary to produce the dots that a human can look at and cry – it's an X!
However, can we deny one comes before another? yes.. depends on how we take “before”. However, can we deny that, by definition, on X isn't the other? seems hard to deny since we wouldn't have to use one and another, as terms, in reference to these 2 Xs.
Hence, it seems when we say that X is like another X, what is claimed is that we are willing to suspend the fact that there's a difference. Willing to forget, for a time being, that there IS an interval between the 2 Xs.
Therefore the claims that the interval between the 2 Xs is an imagination – a process of wondering – be it of a pretending kind. We Know there's a difference between the Xs, and willing, through imagination, to pretend the difference isn't there. In a sense – imagining an imagination away, for a representation to operate. Sounds convoluted to say the least, isn't it? ;)
Moreover: Once a person is willing to suspend unknowingly and imagine away the difference between 2 Xs – It seems to me there's an obvious corruption, perhaps even an obscene corruption when considering that some Use that very suspension of doubt – to their own ends. Once a person is willing to suspend the interval Knowingly – how are they not participating in a cultivation of corruption? [ a genuine question ] (corruption as claimed above with unknowing suspense, and bellow)
Once a person is willing to use and own the interval between X and X to their personal gains – it seems to me a corruption of an exploitative kind. }
once a person's valued ways of imagining is through representations, when another person owns the 1st person's ways of imagining, it seems an imagination can be said to have been banked in more than one way.
at times when representation is a defining technology – eg binary representations – the manipulations of how binary operations work within culture, once privately owned – how can they not own imaginations as well? [again, a genuine question on 2 counts – a is it a correct conclusion, an b, if correct, is there a way out so they don't own?]
ichorian isn't exactly a widely used nor known term. based on ichor, a greek word which came say: ethereal fluid that serves for blood in the veins of the gods. That's after ichor was in connection to a watery discharge from a sore and yellow bile – an illness believed to be and to being caused by excess of irascibility, anger, and bad temper. Poetically, ichor was used in reference to any bloodlike fluid.